Balancing People and Processes

Prioritization is more than rearranging a task list. It is the choices you make to protect the work and the people responsible for carrying it out. Processes bring order and structure, but it is people who give those processes meaning. When either side is ignored, resilience begins to weaken.

In Chem Ops, the pace rarely slows. Equipment runs, deadlines tighten, and unexpected issues can surface without warning. In those moments, your team is watching how you respond. Do you drive the process at any cost, or do you make sure priorities are clear, support is in place, and barriers are removed?

The strength of a team comes from balancing both sides. Leaders who give attention to process and people create steadiness that lasts, not just output for the moment. This session begins with that balance, focusing on clarity, protecting priorities, and helping your team stay steady under pressure.

 
 

Self-Assessment: Balancing People and Processes

Please take a few moments to contemplate the following self-reflection questions. Where can you identify opportunities for personal growth in your leadership?

  1. .Do I regularly check whether my team understands what matters most today?

  2. How do I respond when I see signs of overload or confusion?

  3. Am I clear and consistent in explaining why priorities shift?

  4. Do I dedicate time for “people work” even when tasks feel urgent?

  5. How do I reinforce both performance and well-being in my leadership style?

  6. Do I encourage my team to raise questions or concerns without fear?

  7. How do I balance the need for results with the need for connection?

  8. When I redirect priorities, do I also explain the reasoning behind it?

Remember, this self-assessment is just a starting point for understanding your knowledge of Balancing People and Processes as a leader. It's essential to reflect on your responses and actively work on areas where improvement is needed. Additionally, working with your ECFL Leadership Coach or seeking feedback from a trusted mentor can provide valuable insights into your strengths and weaknesses.


 

Effective prioritization comes down to three essentials: clarity, focus, and balance. Leaders who use these consistently are better prepared to manage the pace of operations and the needs of their teams.

Research shows that switching between tasks can reduce productivity by up to 40%. The constant shift creates mental drag, lowers quality, and slows problem-solving. Studies from the American Psychological Association and Stanford University point out that the brain doesn’t actually “multitask.” Instead, it rapidly switches back and forth, burning energy with every change. Over time, this split attention leaves people more tired and less accurate. A team asked to handle several unclear tasks may look busy, but attention scatters and mistakes rise. That is why clarity matters.

In practice, the contrast is easy to see. A leader who passes along a long list of tasks without direction leaves people scrambling. Confusion grows, focus weakens, and errors increase. A leader who points to the top two or three priorities, explains why they matter, and shields the team from noise gives people the space to work with steadiness. When priorities are protected and people are supported, the operation holds firm under pressure.

Communicating Priorities: Do’s and Don’ts

Do:

  • Pick the top two or three priorities and explain why they matter.

  • Give clear direction so people know where to focus first.

  • Protect the team’s time by reducing unnecessary tasks or distractions.

  • Check in to make sure everyone understands the priorities before moving forward.

Don’t:

  • Hand out long lists without explaining what is most important.

  • Assume your team will figure out what matters most on their own.

  • Change priorities often without explaining the reason.

  • Overload people with too many tasks at once, as that lowers focus and increases mistakes.

If you want your people to think, don’t give instructions. Give intent.
— David Marquet

 

Leaders often face moments when demands pile up at once, and the choice they make in those first few minutes can determine whether or not the day unravels. Take a moment to read the story below and consider the choices you would make if the same pressures came your way.

 

Polly Mer and the Pressure Test

Polly Mer’s shift began with more requests than anyone could handle in a single day. A last-minute equipment inspection had to be scheduled, a manager sent a message about updating production numbers, and a shipment delay meant the team needed to rearrange part of their process. At the same time, one of Polly’s operators flagged a concern about a possible safety issue.

When the team gathered, they looked to Polly for direction. Everyone was ready to start, but without guidance, they risked moving in too many directions at once. Polly had to decide how to set the tone.

Polly had three options:

Choice A: Share the entire list of tasks, emphasize that everything matters, and tell the team to push through as best they can.

Choice B: Select the task that seems most urgent in the moment—the manager’s request for updated numbers—and direct everyone toward it.

Choice C: Identify two or three priorities that have the greatest impact on safety and production, explain why those are critical, and reassure the team that other tasks will be addressed after.

What Would You Choose? Take a moment to think about the situation. If you were Polly, which option would you pick, and why?

 

If Polly chooses A: The team spreads its attention across too many tasks. Some work gets finished, but deadlines slip, the safety concern is barely addressed, and mistakes rise under the pressure. At the end of the shift, people feel drained and uncertain about what actually mattered.

If Polly chooses B: The team rallies around the numbers update and completes it quickly. For a short time, they feel focused. But the safety issue lingers, the inspection gets delayed, and production falls behind. Frustration builds as people realize that chasing the loudest request left the more important work undone.

If Polly chooses C: The team moves forward with confidence. They first address the safety concern, then complete the inspection, and finally realign the process for the delayed shipment. By explaining why these priorities mattered, Polly gave the team clarity and steadiness. Less urgent requests, like the numbers update, are noted for later and cause less stress. By the end of the shift, the team feels both productive and secure in knowing their work made a difference.

Leadership is the ability to facilitate movement in the needed direction and have people feel good about it.
— Tom Smith

 

A leader’s role is to create clarity, clear obstacles, and keep people aligned even when the pace is demanding. The practices below offer simple ways to keep both the work and the people on track.

Best Practices for Balancing People and Processes

  • Stay alert to your team’s focus: A group can stay busy without making progress. Pay attention to where energy is going and whether it connects to safety, quality, or results. If not, step in. Ask questions, redirect attention, or remove barriers. Leaders who stay aware prevent wasted effort and keep the team moving toward meaningful work.

  • Communicate priorities clearly and consistently: Priorities cannot be assumed. Involve your team in setting them, explain why they matter, and make sure everyone knows what to adjust when things shift. When priorities are clear, people work with confidence and spend less time second-guessing what matters most.

  • Protect time for people work: When pressure builds, conversations with your team can be the first thing to slip. Even small moments—a quick check-in, brief feedback, or simple recognition—hold the group steady. Those consistent touches build trust and give people the support they need to focus on the work.

  • Check for clarity before moving on: Setting priorities is not enough. Confirm that they are understood. Ask someone to restate the plan or invite questions before moving forward. This step prevents confusion and ensures that everyone leaves with the same direction.

  • Address obstacles quickly: Priorities lose power if barriers are left in place. Missing tools, unclear instructions, or conflicting demands can undo focus. Act quickly to remove what slows the team down. Clearing the path shows that priorities are more than words; they are backed by action.

  • Balance task and relationship goals: Teams perform best when both performance and connection are respected. Focusing only on tasks can push results but weaken trust. Paying attention to relationships without guiding the work creates drift. The strongest leaders balance both, building teams that are productive and engaged.

 
 

Lasting discipline depends on leaders who hold both people and processes in balance. When processes run without regard for people, burnout, confusion, and mistakes eventually follow. When people are supported without clear processes, effort scatters and results slip. Leaders who prioritize well keep both in view, protecting what matters most while building stability that endures.

In this module, we explored how to lead ourselves with intention, how urgency can disguise itself as importance, how leaders can name and protect what truly matters, and how to communicate priorities in a way that brings both clarity and stability. Each step builds on the same foundation: operational discipline depends on deliberate choices, steady alignment, and the ability to hold focus when demands compete.

The measure of strong leadership is not only in output but in how steadily that output can be sustained. When people and process move together, priorities hold, resilience builds, and the work carries forward with strength that lasts beyond the moment.

Reflection Questions:

  1. When I look at how I set priorities, do I lean more toward keeping processes on track or toward supporting people? What happens as a result?

  2. Have I noticed times when pushing the process too hard created burnout or mistakes? What could I have done differently to steady both the work and the team?

  3. In what ways do I make it clear to my team that people and processes carry equal weight in my leadership?

  4. How can I build habits that keep me from overlooking either side, ensuring the work is done with discipline and the people stay engaged and supported?


 

Strengthen your understanding of Balancing People and Processes by sticking with the following resources. Use this opportunity to note new insights and adhere to practices that will enhance your leadership journey.

The Importance of Balancing Task- and People-Focus in Leadership

Do you feel overwhelmed? Here’s why – and how to fix it

Multitasking: Switching costs

Heavy multitaskers have reduced memory | Stanford Report


Previous
Previous

Knowing What Really Matters

Next
Next

Prioritization: Lab Report